A parliamentary proposal would require al-Zidi and his ministers to make a written pledge before gaining confidence.

On Wednesday, Ali Al-Sarai, a member of the “Reconstruction and Development” bloc, revealed that he had submitted a request to the Speaker of Parliament to add a clause to the government program that Prime Minister-designate Ali Al-Zidi would present, which would require nominated ministers to make a written pledge before being granted confidence.

Al-Sarai told Shafaq News Agency that the proposal stipulates that ministers should not run for the upcoming parliamentary or provincial council elections, and that their first and second degree relatives should not run, with the aim of preventing ministries from being used for election propaganda and exploiting government power and influence in election campaigns.

He added that the proposal also includes those with the rank of minister and undersecretary, provided that the aforementioned paragraph is added later through an amendment to the election law.

It is noted that on Monday, April 27, 2026, the President of the Republic of Iraq, Nizar Amidi, tasked businessman Ali al-Zaidi with forming the new Iraqi government, after he was nominated by the Coordination Framework, succeeding Mohammed Shia al-Sudani.

The Iraqi parliament announced that the vote on the new government will take place next week, and that the names and the government program will be received by the end of this week.

Shafaq.com

Al-Kaabi responds to calls for the “disarmament” of Iraqi factions: This is a red line and will not be surrendered, even at the cost of lives.

Akram al-Kaabi, the leader of the Iraqi al-Nujaba Movement, responded on Wednesday to calls by the United States to “disarm” Iraqi factions, stressing that it is a “red line and will not be surrendered even if lives are sacrificed.”

In a post on the X platform, Al-Kaabi accused Israel of “direct Israeli incitement and provocation” of the US chargé d’affaires in Iraq to speak about the “resistance” weapons, expressing his regret that “a few (Iraqis) have become mouthpieces for these people,” and calling on Iraqi armed factions to “reject the very idea of ​​discussing this issue.”

He added, “The resistance’s weapons are a red line, (…) and we protected Iraq with them from the defilement of ISIS and their American masters,” stressing that these weapons “will not be surrendered as long as we have breath, and will not be taken even if lives are sacrificed.”

On April 27, 2026, the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, issued decisions regarding restricting weapons to the state and taking firm measures against outlaws, as well as military penalties against security officials who fail to fulfill their duties.

The US Treasury Department announced on Tuesday that it is offering a reward of up to $10 million for information leading to Akram Abbas al-Kaabi, the leader of the Iraqi “al-Nujaba” movement.

The move comes as part of an escalating US campaign targeting leaders of Iraqi armed factions, as Washington previously announced a similar reward of $10 million for information on Hashim Finyan Rahim al-Saraji, known as Abu Ala al-Walai, leader of the Sayyid al-Shuhada Brigades in Iraq, and Haider Mazhar, known as Haider al-Gharawi, leader of the Ansar Allah al-Awfiya Movement.

According to the U.S. Diplomatic Security Service’s “Rewards for Justice” program, Washington accuses the faction leaders of leading a group loyal to Iran, and says its members were involved in killing Iraqi civilians and attacking U.S. diplomatic facilities, bases, and military personnel.

Shafaq.com

The Interior Minister announces the completion of the “concrete wall” on the Iraqi-Syrian border.

Interior Minister Abdul Amir al-Shammari announced on Wednesday the completion of the “concrete wall” along the Iraqi border with Syria.

Al-Shammari said during a ceremony held on this occasion, according to a statement received by Shafaq News Agency, that this project, which has been underway since 2022, represents the true “safety valve” for Iraq, as it puts an end to security challenges, foremost among them terrorist infiltration and smuggling operations.

Iraq had built a concrete barrier wall on the western border strip with Syria, in the “Al-Qaim” area north of the Euphrates River, with a length of 160 kilometers and a height of 3 meters, with the aim of strengthening border security and preventing smuggling operations and the flow of infiltrators from various armed organizations across it.

Last year, the Security and Defense Committee of the Iraqi Parliament confirmed that the security situation on the border with Syria was well secured, due to the fact that Iraq, from the first moments of the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime on December 8, 2014, sent full security reinforcements from the Ministries of Defense and Interior, in addition to the Popular Mobilization Forces, as well as installing thermal cameras and observation towers and closing all gaps.

Shafaq.com

A former US Army colonel predicts a “victory” declaration between his country and Iran as part of a settlement to end the war.

Retired U.S. Army Colonel Miles B. Caggins III predicted on Wednesday that Washington and Tehran would continue to de-escalate tensions within the framework of the diplomatic track in preparation for announcing a comprehensive peace agreement in the Middle East region.

“After weeks of war and the resulting major disruptions to the global oil, natural gas, helium and fertilizer industries, all parties are looking to end the war,” said Kagenz III, a nonresident senior fellow at the New Lines Institute, to Shafaq News. He added that “de-escalation is likely to continue through peace negotiations that allow all parties to declare victory.”

This statement comes as US officials have said that Washington and Tehran are close to reaching an agreement on a one-page memorandum to end the war, stressing that the United States expects a response from Tehran on several key points within 48 hours.

According to Axios, citing those officials, the agreement includes Iran suspending uranium enrichment, Washington lifting sanctions and releasing Iranian funds, and both sides lifting restrictions on passage through the Strait of Hormuz.

The website revealed that the current memorandum between Tehran and Washington declares the end of the war and the start of 30 days of negotiations regarding the Strait of Hormuz, the nuclear file, and sanctions, stressing that US forces will reimpose the naval blockade or resume military action if negotiations with Iran collapse.

Shafaq.com

The Peshmerga demand to be included under the laws and privileges of the Iraqi forces.

On Wednesday, the Chief of Staff of the Ministry of Peshmerga, Lieutenant General Issa Ozeer, discussed with the members of the Security and Defense Committee in the Iraqi Parliament, Sherwan Dubardani and Chiman Barzani, the inclusion of the Peshmerga forces in the laws and privileges specific to the Iraqi security forces.

The Ministry of Peshmerga stated in a statement received by Shafaq News Agency that the meeting, which was held at the Ministry’s headquarters in Erbil, addressed strengthening relations between the Ministry of Peshmerga and the Security and Defense Committee in the Iraqi Parliament.

She added that both sides stressed the importance of legal coordination to ensure that decisions and laws related to security forces are reflected in the Peshmerga forces, as they are an essential part of the Iraqi defense system.

The statement indicated that another aspect of the discussions addressed draft laws related to services and privileges granted to the armed forces, with emphasis on the need for the Peshmerga forces, along with other Iraqi forces, to be an essential part of the beneficiaries of those privileges and new draft laws.

Shafaq.com

Trump: The operation will end if Iran agrees to the deal, otherwise there will be a larger bombing campaign.

US President Donald Trump suggested on Wednesday that Tehran would agree to the deal to open the Strait of Hormuz, warning of a “bigger bombing” if it did not.

Trump said, “If Iran agrees to what has been agreed upon, then Operation Epic Wrath will be over.”

He added that “the Strait of Hormuz will be opened to everyone, including Iran” if the agreement is approved.

He warned that “if Iran does not agree, the bombing will begin at a much higher level,” while suggesting that “Iran will most likely agree to this agreement.”

US officials said earlier on Wednesday that Washington and Tehran were close to reaching an agreement on a one-page memorandum to end the war.

According to Axios, citing US officials, “The United States expects a response from Tehran on several key points within 48 hours.”

Shafaq.com

Iraq’s oil discounts: A forced maneuver or a strategic loss?

In a market supposedly governed by cold, hard numbers, Iraq has delivered a bombshell that has turned the pricing rules upside down. Discounts exceeding $30 per barrel on Basra crude are not mere temporary reductions, but a clear indication that the oil market is no longer driven solely by supply and demand, but by risk, conflict, and influence. What is happening today is not traditional competition between producers, but a race for survival in an environment where safety margins are eroding and the definition of “fair price” is being redefined under geopolitical pressure. While prices are rising globally, Iraq has chosen to swim against the tide, a bold move that raises a crucial question: Are we witnessing a clever maneuver to seize markets, or the beginning of an economic hemorrhage that will be difficult to stem?

Under intense geopolitical pressure, Iraq, which relies on oil to finance more than 90% of its budget revenues, finds itself facing a stark dilemma: either maintain the flow of exports, even at low prices, or risk losing markets due to the soaring shipping and insurance costs associated with sensitive waterways like the Arabian Gulf. In this context, the discount of approximately $33 per barrel, equivalent to roughly 30% to 35% of an oil price hovering around $100, can be interpreted as a tool to compensate for risks that buyers are no longer willing to bear without compensation.

However, this policy, despite its tactical rationale, carries a direct economic cost. If we assume that Iraq exports approximately 3.3 million barrels per day, a discount averaging $30 translates to a loss of nearly $99 million daily, or more than $36 billion annually if this equation persists for an extended period. These figures are not theoretical; they practically represent a reduction in the state’s financial capacity to fund salaries, support services, and implement investment projects.

International experiences provide clear examples of this type of “forced pricing.” During the Western sanctions imposed on Russia after 2022, Moscow was forced to sell its oil at discounts that at times reached $25–$35 per barrel compared to Brent crude, leading to a decline in its oil revenues of nearly 20%, despite continued export volumes. Although Russia was later able to gradually rebalance its economy, this required time and a restructuring of its export networks and trade alliances.

Iraq’s situation differs in terms of infrastructure and logistical flexibility. While some countries have multiple export outlets or alternative pipelines that reduce their reliance on geographical bottlenecks, Iraq remains more vulnerable to fluctuations, limiting its room for maneuver. This makes price cuts less a strategic choice and more a reflection of pragmatic constraints. The most profound impact is seen in the general
budget.

If the budget is based on an estimated price of around $70 or $80 per barrel, actual sales at much lower levels will create a financing gap that could exceed 15% to 25% of total expected revenues, forcing the government to choose between increasing the deficit or reducing spending. In an economy where domestic activity is heavily dependent on government spending, any fiscal contraction will directly impact growth rates and employment opportunities.

Who profits from discounts? A look at market behavior reveals that
large discounts don’t go unnoticed. Refineries, particularly in Asia, and especially independent refineries in China and India, are among the biggest winners, as they obtain crude oil at prices lower than their competitors, thus boosting their profit margins. However, this doesn’t necessarily translate into a significant increase in demand. In many cases, the effect is limited to redirecting purchases towards cheaper crude rather than creating new demand.

This means that Iraq may succeed in retaining its customers, but it doesn’t necessarily guarantee expanding its market share, a crucial distinction in assessing the viability of this policy. Are discounts beneficial or detrimental?Despite all the above, this policy cannot be described as an outright loss. Losing markets or disrupting exports would have cost Iraq far more, not only in terms of revenue but also in terms of long-term loss of commercial confidence. Maintaining the flow of oil, even at a lower price, means preserving contractual relationships and supply chains, a critical element in a competitive market.

In conclusion , Iraq’s oil discounts reflect a clear economic paradox: they are simultaneously a short-term rescue tool and a long-term drain. Their success is measured not only by the volume of exports they maintain, but also by Iraq’s ability to exit them in a timely manner. The market may understand the discount as an exception, but it quickly comes to treat it as the norm if it persists, at which point restoring the true value of the oil becomes more difficult and costly.

Rawabetcenter.com

A leader in the Anbar Alliance: The Ministry of Finance is fueling the disputes between Halbousi and Samarrai.

On Tuesday, Ibrahim Ali al-Dulaimi, a leader in the United Anbar Alliance, revealed that the Ministry of Finance had ignited the intensity of the disputes between the Progress Alliance, headed by Mohammed al-Halbousi, and Azm Muthanna al-Samarrai, as each of them claims that his party has the right to manage the Ministry of Finance.

Al-Dulaimi told Al-Maalouma that “the political talks between the Progress Alliance, headed by Mohammed Al-Halbousi, and the Azm Alliance, headed by Muthanna Al-Samarrai, have deepened the differences and tensions between the two sides over the new distribution of sovereign ministries in the new government formation, after unconfirmed reports that the Ministry of Finance is allocated to the Sunni component.”

He added that “Al-Halbousi claimed that the Ministry of Finance was allocated to his party because it received a high percentage of votes, while Al-Samarrai called for a review of the position of Speaker of Parliament, as it is an entitlement for the component and not for a specific party.”

He explained that “the position of the Ministry of Finance ignited the intensity of the disputes between Al-Halbousi and Al-Samarrai after the latter threatened to withdraw from the council because he does not represent the will of the leaders of the component in the mechanism for distributing positions.”

He confirmed that “some leaders of the National Council sided with al-Samarrai and supported his demand that al-Halbousi’s party has no right to manage the Ministry of Finance file if the narrative of returning the Ministry of Finance to the Sunni component is true.”

Burathanews.com

A source reveals the Coordination Framework’s response to the Trump-Zaidi call.

A political source revealed the nature of the Coordination Framework’s response to the US President’s call. Donald Trump and the prime minister-designate Ali Al-Zaidi.
And it was reported Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper The source stated that “the forces of the Coordination Framework remained silent regarding what appeared to be a lengthy phone call between the US President and the person tasked with forming the government. “Ali Al-Zaidi She demanded that he disclose it in a private meeting.”

The source added that “Zaidi The attendees from the framework forces were clearly informed of the nature of the call Trump had made, which led the coordinating framework forces to encourage al-Zaydi to continue dealing with US The American approach during these months, in a way that does not provoke resentment and does not completely comply with American demands, is to leave it to time to resolve all the issues.”

He explained that “this measure came after the framework forces were briefed on the outlines of the American message, which was followed by the dispatch of the first shipment of US dollars, which appeared to be a reward for al-Zaidi, who, according to an uncompromising American demand, is required to form an Iraqi government free of terrorism, according to the American characterization of the Iraqi armed factions.”

Alsumaria.tv

The opening of Nasiriyah Airport in 2026 will be an important gateway for domestic and international flights.

Former member of the Parliamentary Services Committee, Baqir al-Saadi, confirmed on Tuesday that the opening of Nasiriyah International Airport will take place during the year 2026, noting that it will represent an important gateway for domestic and international aviation.

Al-Saadi told Al-Maalouma that “the project to establish Nasiriyah International Airport has reached its final stages,” noting that “within a short period we will reach the stage of the airport’s readiness and its official opening, which will allow for domestic and international flights after all requirements have been completed.”

He added that “the airport will be a qualitative addition to the map of airports at the national level, especially since it enjoys a strategic location,” indicating that “the presence of investment companies, the movement of businessmen and the desire of many to travel will contribute to activating the work of Nasiriyah Airport in a clear way.”

He indicated that “the next phase will witness a new vital airport in the south of the country, which will contribute to supporting the economic and service sectors in Dhi Qar Governorate.”

Almaalomah.me