Baghdad caught between Washington and Hezbollah: British report reveals Iraqi mediation efforts
The developments related to Iraq’s position on Lebanese Hezbollah reflect the hedging policy pursued by Ali al-Zaidi’s government, which is “unable” to completely separate itself from the factions linked to Iran, while at the same time flirting with the United States and the Gulf states, according to the British website “ Amwaj ”.
The website, in a report translated by Shafaq News Agency, indicated that a delegation from the party had met with al-Zaidi before his recent visit to Washington, where the Iraqi Prime Minister offered to mediate between the party and Washington to facilitate talks between them. Dailynews reports
The British website said in its report that the United States is exerting pressure against the Lebanese Hezbollah from Baghdad to Damascus and Beirut, adding that since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein’s regime after the 2003 invasion of Iraq, successive Iraqi governments have maintained strong ties with the Lebanese party.
However, the website noted in its report that recent developments have raised questions about whether this policy might change, recalling that the Iraqi Ministry of Finance quietly ordered Iraqi banks in mid-July to implement US Treasury sanctions against individuals and companies linked to the party.
The report also stated that the official gazette had listed Hezbollah and the Yemeni Ansar Allah movement as “terrorist” entities last November, before Baghdad quickly backtracked, blaming what happened on a technical error.
The report noted the incident on July 16 in which Syrian customs intercepted a shipment of weapons hidden in an oil tanker, believed to have been destined for Lebanon from Iraq.
According to the report, these two incidents show that the Iraqi government is caught between competing patrons, as Baghdad appears unable to decisively break away from the Iranian-aligned Iraqi armed factions at home, while courting Washington and the Gulf capitals abroad, adding that al-Zaidi adopted this hedge rather than clearly siding with either direction.
He went on to say that it was uncertain whether Baghdad would be able to maintain this position until the September 30 deadline for bringing armed factions under state control.
The report quoted regional analyst Emile Nakhleh, a former CIA officer, as saying that Baghdad is “getting closer to Washington,” noting that al-Zaidi is seeking to establish a closer relationship with US President Donald Trump, while distancing Iraq from Iran and Hezbollah.
According to the report, this assessment is consistent with the broader US campaign against Hezbollah’s financial and logistical affairs, which extend to Beirut, Damascus, and Baghdad. It notes that Washington has shown more willingness to use its influence over Baghdad to limit Iran’s regional presence, which was clearly demonstrated by US President Donald Trump’s objection to the nomination of State of Law leader Nouri al-Maliki for a third term as prime minister, and the threat of Iraq losing economic support, which led to the selection of al-Zaidi at the end of April.
After noting the ability of American desires to shape Iraqi policy, the report said at the same time that the coordinating framework, whose parties maintain deep ties with armed groups allied with Iran, leaves al-Zaydi with little room to make a decisive move against the Iraqi allies of Lebanese Hezbollah, pointing in this context to the leader of the Iraqi Hezbollah Brigades, Ahmed al-Hamidawi, who maintains close coordination with Lebanese Hezbollah, and who opposes Baghdad’s efforts to further integrate armed factions into the official state security structure.
The report quoted Ali Al-Mamouri, a researcher at Deakin University, as saying that “Hezbollah’s ties to Iraq are rooted in decades-long relationships with Iraqi Shiite opposition groups that developed during their exile in Syria and Lebanon throughout the 1980s and beyond,” adding that many of these figures now occupy influential positions within Iraq’s political and security institutions, noting that this long-standing relationship makes it unlikely that Baghdad will significantly change its stance to actively work against the party.
The report noted that the party’s designation as a terrorist organization in Baghdad was not addressed during Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam’s visit to Baghdad on July 26, as he discussed with al-Zaidi the revival of the Kirkuk-Banias pipeline and the possibility of extending it to the Lebanese coastal city of Tripoli.
The report went on to say that this engagement reflects how Washington is now positioning its economic incentives for both Baghdad and Beirut in bilateral relations in Iraq and Lebanon.
Faced with Washington’s increasingly firm stance, the British report said that al-Zaidi might seek to hedge as an active strategy rather than take a passive hedging position, quoting an official in the Lebanese Hezbollah as saying that al-Zaidi’s administration had offered to sponsor direct talks between the party and Washington.
According to the same source, a delegation from the Lebanese party quietly visited al-Zaidi in Iraq in early July, and during the talks, the Iraqi Prime Minister made “a proposal under which Iraq would sponsor and host talks between Hezbollah and the US administration.”
The report noted that the offer appeared to have preceded al-Zaidi’s trip to Washington, although the official did not clarify the party’s response.
The report continued, noting that Trump appeared to have left the door open to such Iraqi mediation, saying on July 21 that he would be willing to talk to Hezbollah leaders if Lebanese President Joseph Aoun thought it would be helpful.
Shafaq.com