A split within the framework into three factions, and Maliki confronts the objectors with a new condition.

An informed political source revealed on Wednesday that escalating divisions within the coordination framework are threatening the convening of the anticipated meeting to decide on the name of the prime minister candidate, amid sharp differences among its leaders regarding the figure who will assume the position in the next phase.

These disputes come at a time when the government formation process has entered a critical constitutional phase, following the election of Nizar Amidi as President of the Republic on April 11, and the obligation of the largest parliamentary bloc to present its candidate for the premiership within a maximum period of 15 days.

The source told Shafaq News Agency that the disagreements within the framework are no longer limited to differing viewpoints, but have developed into an actual split within the alliance into three main wings, which has cast a shadow over today’s meeting scheduled to be held at Humam Hamoudi’s house, with growing doubts about the possibility of postponing it to another date.

According to the source, the first faction insists on nominating the leader of the State of Law Coalition, Nouri al-Maliki, or any figure who enjoys his explicit support from among the proposed names, while the second faction is pushing for the renaming of the caretaker Prime Minister, Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, while the third faction prefers to go for a compromise candidate who can gain wider acceptance within and outside the Shiite bloc.

He added that the leaders decided to put a list of names on the meeting table, including Nouri al-Maliki or someone who has his support, Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, Basim al-Badri, Ali Youssef al-Shukri, Hamid al-Shatri, Abdul-Ilah al-Naili, and Mohsen al-Mandalawi.

This dispute is more sensitive because al-Maliki was originally put forward as an official candidate for the Coordination Framework for the Prime Ministership, before the calculations became complicated later due to internal objections and external pressures, most notably the American position rejecting the establishment of a government that it sees as subject to Iranian influence, which reshuffled the cards within the framework and prompted some of its parties to reopen the search for alternatives or a compromise candidate.

For his part, Abu Mithaq al-Masari, a member of the coordinating framework, told Shafaq News Agency that the problem was no longer limited to the name of the candidate, but extended to the method of withdrawing al-Maliki’s nomination itself.

According to Al-Masari, Al-Maliki insists that those who oppose his nomination submit individual requests signed with their names, thus clearly holding each party politically responsible. Meanwhile, leaders within the framework who reject his return insist that the withdrawal request be collective and under the title of the Coordinating Framework, in order to avoid turning the crisis into a direct personal confrontation with him.

The scene is becoming more complicated with the continuation of mutual boycotts within the framework, as Shafaq News sources reported earlier that a meeting scheduled for this week was postponed due to a boycott by some leaders, while a small meeting held at al-Maliki’s house discussed the agenda of the next meeting and the nominated names, with the addition of Ali al-Shukri’s name to the list of contenders, at a time when Basim al-Badri is emerging as one of the most prominent settlement candidates.

Shafaq.com

Initial agreement between Washington and Tehran to extend the ceasefire

The Associated Press, citing responsible sources, reported on Wednesday that the United States and Iran have reached a preliminary agreement to extend the ceasefire, paving the way for discussions on a permanent peace formula to end the repercussions of the 40-day military conflict in the region.

The agency quoted officials, who asked not to be identified, as saying that “Washington and Tehran have given initial approval to extend the truce in order to give diplomatic efforts an additional chance to reach sustainable solutions.”

The two sides had announced on April 8 that they had reached a two-week truce, followed by a round of negotiations in the Pakistani capital, Islamabad, but it ended without tangible results.

Although the resumption of combat operations has not been officially announced, the field situation remains tense following the imposition of a US naval blockade on Iranian ports, which makes extending the truce a critical step to prevent the region from sliding into a new round of confrontation.

Shafaq.com

Al-Jubouri rules out deciding on a candidate for prime minister within the current week.

The former MP, Thaer al – Jubouri, ruled out on Tuesday the possibility of the Coordination Framework finalizing its candidate for prime minister this week. He indicated that meetings and consultations are still ongoing, suggesting that the nomination of the largest bloc’s candidate will likely be decided in the final hours of the constitutional deadline.

Speaking to Al-Maalomah, al-Jubouri said, “Speculation that the Coordination Framework will officially announce its candidate for the next prime minister this week is unlikely, in our view, for several reasons.” He added that “holding a broad meeting among the Framework’s leaders may depend on the understandings that will emerge regarding this important matter.”

He explained that “the final hours of the constitutional deadline for presenting the largest bloc’s candidate to the president for his appointment may witness the identification and naming of the candidate.” He clarified that “several names are being discussed, but the Coordination Framework, as the largest parliamentary bloc, is ultimately the body authorized to nominate the candidate.”

Al-Jubouri affirmed that “the Coordination Framework is committed to the constitutional timelines and keen to expedite the formation of the government in light of clear internal and external challenges, particularly in the financial, economic, and security sectors.” He stressed that “forming a fully empowered government is of paramount importance, not only for the Coordination Framework but for all political forces in the country.”

Almaalomah.me

The Patriotic Union sets a condition for participating in the regional government.

Burhan Sheikh Raouf, a member of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), confirmed on Tuesday that the caretaker government in the Kurdistan Region, headed by Masrour Barzani, has not been up to par, stressing the need to formulate a government program that is completely different from the previous one.

Sheikh Raouf told Al-Maalomah News Agency, “The caretaker government has not corrected its course and has not delivered anything tangible to the citizens.” He explained that “the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) is ready for dialogue regarding the formation of the new government, but on the condition that the scenario of the current Barzani-led government is not repeated.”

He added, “The next phase requires a government that is radically different in its performance and possesses an ambitious program that meets the aspirations of the people.” He pointed out that “the PUK will not agree to the formation of a government that reproduces the failures of the caretaker government, which has not addressed the service and living conditions in the region.”

Almaalomah.me

US reinforcements for Harir base: 1,000 soldiers on their way to Erbil

A local source in Anbar province reported on Tuesday that US forces intend to reinforce their military presence in northern Iraq by deploying more than 1,000 troops to both Harir Air Base and the US Consulate in Erbil.

The source told Al-Maalomah that “initial contingents of troops have arrived by air at Harir Air Base, with additional reinforcements expected in the coming period, with the aim of securing US facilities in Erbil.” He added that these movements coincide with escalating regional tensions, amid stalled negotiations regarding the Iranian nuclear issue.
He noted that “US forces had previously reduced some of their presence at the base before sending new reinforcements, without any official confirmation so far from the US Department of Defense or Iraqi government authorities.

It is worth noting that Harir Air Base is one of the locations where international coalition forces are stationed and witnesses occasional military movements related to security developments in the region.

Almaalomah.me

State of Law: Maliki remains the “most prominent” candidte for Prime Minister

Imran Karkoush, a member of the State of Law Coalition, confirmed on Tuesday that the coalition’s leader, Nouri al-Maliki, remains the leading candidate for the premiership in the next phase. He also indicated that the coordination framework meeting scheduled for Wednesday will be “crucial” in shaping the new government.

Karkoush told the Information Agency, “Nouri al-Maliki is still the most likely candidate and the leading contender within the coordination framework to form the government,” explaining that “the atmosphere within the framework is moving towards resolving outstanding issues.”

He added that “tomorrow’s coordination framework meeting will be pivotal and decisive in determining the final steps of the political process.”

Karkoush continued, “If changes occur and al-Maliki’s candidacy is withdrawn from the prime ministerial race, the framework possesses considerable flexibility, and there are several names being considered for the position.” He emphasized that “the primary objective is to form a strong government capable of confronting the challenges.”
Political circles are awaiting the results of tomorrow’s meeting of the Coordination Framework forces, amid leaks indicating a serious desire to expedite the selection of a new prime minister to end the political deadlock.

Almaalomah.me

Following its blocking at the direction of the Sudanese government, the Ministry of Communications stated that there is no date set for the return of Telegram in Iraq.
A source within the Communications Authority denied on Tuesday the validity of reports circulating about a date being set for the return of the Telegram service in Iraq, after its recent blocking at the direction of caretaker Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and under US orders.

The source told the Information Agency that “what is being circulated regarding the imminent reactivation of the application is incorrect,” emphasizing that “there is no official decision or date for the service’s return yet.”

He added that “the information circulating through some media outlets and social media platforms is not based on official sources,” urging reliance only on statements issued by the relevant authorities.

The source indicated that “any update related to the operation of applications or digital services in the country will be announced exclusively through official channels.”

Almaalomah.me

Between Maliki, Abadi, and compromise candidates: 3 scenarios on the table to decide the premiership

The Iraqi political scene is witnessing intense activity within the Coordination Framework, as consultations and closed-door meetings continue to resolve the issue of the next prime minister’s candidate. This comes amidst public anticipation and differing opinions regarding the shape of the upcoming political phase.

According to political sources, the Coordination Framework’s leadership is holding successive meetings at the homes of several of its leaders in Baghdad, attempting to reach a consensus formula that will end the current political deadlock and determine the identity of the candidate who will lead the next government during what is described as a sensitive period both domestically and internationally.

On Monday evening, the Coordination Framework’s leadership held a small meeting at the home of Nouri al-Maliki, head of the State of Law Coalition, with several prominent figures in attendance, to discuss the agenda for the upcoming meeting dedicated to resolving the issue of the prime ministership.

An informed political source told Al-Maalomah that “the meeting included Nouri al-Maliki, the head of the Supreme Islamic Council, Humam Hamoudi, the head of the Hikma Movement, Ammar al-Hakim, the Secretary-General of Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq, Qais al-Khazali, and the Popular Mobilization Forces leader, Abu Fadak al-Muhammadawi.”
He indicated that “the discussions focused on the mechanism for managing internal agreements, the proposed names, and the possibility of bridging the viewpoints of the various parties.”

He noted that “those present also discussed the nature of the upcoming meeting expected to be held at the home of the head of the Supreme Islamic Council, Humam Hamoudi, which will be dedicated to continuing discussions on the candidates and finalizing the decision-making mechanism, whether through direct consensus or internal voting.”
In a related context, the spokesperson for the Victory Coalition, Salam al-Zubaidi, revealed details of a crucial meeting of the leaders of the Coordination Framework scheduled for Wednesday. He explained that the meeting will discuss three main scenarios for deciding on the nomination of the largest bloc’s candidate for the next prime minister.
Al-Zubaidi clarified to Al-Maalomah that “the first scenario involves reaching an agreement on one of the currently proposed names, including Mohammed Shia al-Sudani or Haider al-Abadi as potential alternatives if no agreement is reached on other names within the framework. The second scenario involves selecting a candidate from a list of nine names that were proposed in previous meetings, with six of them still under active discussion.”

He explained that “the third scenario involves choosing a ‘compromise candidate’ from outside the coordination framework if agreement on the first two options proves impossible. However, this option remains, in his words, unlikely at the present stage, given the political forces’ desire to keep the decision within the internal framework.”
He pointed out that “the forces within the coordination framework remain committed to the option of consensus and agreement as the primary path to resolving the issue of the next prime minister, in order to avoid any divisions that might affect the unified political stance of the largest bloc, at a time when political, economic, and security pressures are increasing, requiring a swift resolution to this matter.”

Almaalomah.me

Al-Abadi’s coalition reveals “three scenarios” for deciding on the framework candidate in tomorrow’s meeting

The spokesperson for the Victory Coalition, Salam al-Zubaidi, revealed on Tuesday details of a crucial meeting of the leaders of the Coordination Framework scheduled for Wednesday. He explained that the meeting will discuss three main scenarios for deciding on the nomination of the largest bloc’s candidate for prime minister.

Al-Zubaidi told Al-Maalomah News Agency, “The leaders of the Framework will hold their meeting tomorrow after it was postponed yesterday at the request of the head of the State of Law Coalition, Nouri al-Maliki.” He indicated that “the political table of the Framework’s leaders has three paths regarding deciding on the largest bloc’s candidate for the next prime minister. The first involves discussing and agreeing on Mohammed Shia al-Sudani or Haider al-Abadi as alternatives to al-Maliki.”

He added, “The second scenario involves choosing one of the six remaining candidates from the previously proposed list of nine. The third scenario involves a compromise candidate from outside the framework if the first two options are not agreed upon.” He described the latter option as “very weak at the present time,” explaining that “the forces within the Coordination Framework are still keen to ensure a unanimous vote on the next prime minister candidate to guarantee the unity of the largest bloc’s political stance.”
It is worth noting that the head of the Tasmeem Alliance, Amer al-Fayez, revealed in a press statement followed by Al-Maalouma last Sunday that the Coordination Framework intends to discuss the names of nine candidates for prime minister at its meeting tomorrow.

He indicated that“among the nominated names are the head of the State of Law Coalition, Nouri al-Maliki; the caretaker prime minister, Mohammed Shia al-Sudani; former prime minister, Haider al-Abadi; the head of the Accountability and Justice Commission, Basim al-Badri; the leader of the Asas Party, Mohsen al-Mandalawi; the head of the Intelligence Service, Hamid al-Shatri; the prime minister’s advisor, Mohammed Sahib al-Daraji; the former Minister of Planning, Ali Shukri; and the National Security Advisor, Qasim al-Araji.”

Almaalomah.me

A battle intensifies in Iraq following the election of Amidi, amid divisions.

Iraq ended months of political paralysis by electing Nizar Amadi as the sixth president of the republic since 2003, but this also revealed deep structural divisions that threaten to prolong instability, with attention now turning to the more controversial battle over the premiership, according to a reading by the British website Middle East Online.

The British report , translated by Shafaq News Agency, began by mentioning statements by Amidi, who received 227 votes in a second round of voting after his election, in which he acknowledged the magnitude of the upcoming challenges and pledged to work according to the principle of “Iraq First”.

However, the report noted that this breakthrough came in a disputed session marked by boycotts from major political forces, including the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the State of Law Coalition, which reflects the “fragility of the political consensus,” as the Kurdistan Democratic Party criticized the House of Representatives for violating procedures, questioning whether the session had met the required legal quorum of 220 legislators.

According to the report, the dispute is not only about procedural concerns, but also reflects a deeper Kurdish rivalry, noting that the disagreement between the two Kurdish parties weakens Kurdish unity and limits their influence in Baghdad.

The report continued that these divisions come at a critical moment, as Iraq is undergoing a transitional movement amid the US-Israeli war on Iran, and Iraqi armed factions allied with Iran have launched attacks on US-linked targets, which in turn have led to retaliatory strikes that have killed Iraqis.

The report noted that, in light of these volatile conditions, the focus is now shifting towards the formation of the government, which represents the true weight of power within the Iraqi system, recalling that the constitution requires the new president to task, within 15 days, the nominee of the largest parliamentary bloc with forming a government, a process that must be completed within 30 days.

Nevertheless, the report noted that the definition of the “largest bloc” remains disputed, while the coordinating framework, despite having a parliamentary majority, is internally divided over who to nominate.

He explained that although the Coordination Framework had previously supported former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, his nomination is facing local and international objections, including warnings from US President Donald Trump about possible consequences related to US support.

The report indicated that the crisis is exacerbated by the sectarian power-sharing system surrounding the presidency, the prime ministership, and the parliament, which creates overlapping levels of negotiation and veto power, while the Iraqi public is closely watching and betting with high expectations on a government capable of dealing with economic challenges, unemployment, and the failure of public services.

According to the British report, the danger lies in the continued division, especially within the Kurdish ranks and among the Shiite forces, which could prolong the stalemate that has left Iraq without a fully functioning government for about 150 days.

The report stated that Amidi’s election does not represent a new starting point, but rather a constitutional step that closes one chapter of the crisis and opens a more decisive and perhaps more volatile phase.

The report concluded by asking, “Whether Iraq moves toward a political consensus to produce a stable government, or slides back into prolonged paralysis, will depend on the ability of political actors to reconcile competing interests in a system increasingly strained by internal rivalries and external pressures.”

Shafaq.com