It is time to raise the price of the Iraqi dinar against the dollar
Since the Iraqi government issued its decision in December 2020 to devalue the Iraqi dinar, controversy has been raging in Iraq about the feasibility of this step, its obligations, and the effects it may have. It is common in Iraq to describe the reduction of the price of the dinar against foreign currencies, and the US dollar in particular, as “raising the price of the dollar.” This is a mistake because the value of the dollar did not rise, but the value of the Iraqi dinar was reduced by a government decision. And if this procedure was justified when it was taken, then it has become a matter of reversing it, necessitated by several economic considerations, which we will discuss in this study.
Usually a country has its own currency that is commonly used in internal financial and commercial transactions, while foreign currencies are used in foreign exchanges. The country pegs its currency at a specific exchange rate against foreign currencies, which makes the value of the currency guaranteed. Of course, there is the exception of floating the currency, i.e. liberating it from any controls or interventions by the government or the central bank, a procedure that countries sometimes resort to to allow the prices of their floating currencies to fluctuate in line with the fluctuations of supply and demand for currencies in the market.
The devaluation of the currency is one of the monetary policy tools that countries resort to in some cases. In practice, this means that the authority concerned with managing monetary policy in the country takes an official decision to reduce the value of the local currency against foreign currencies, which automatically leads to an increase in foreign exchange rates, which explains the common confusion of many as they describe the devaluation of the currency as Increase in foreign exchange rates.
For example, if we assume that the Central Bank of Iraq took a decision today to devalue the Iraqi dinar, the result of this is to modify the dollar exchange rate from 1460.50 Iraqi dinars, which is its price at the time of writing these lines, to an amount equal to a higher amount in Iraqi dinars, let’s say 2000 Iraqi dinars, for example.
The authorities supervising monetary policy usually seek to maintain a fixed exchange rate for a currency in the exchange market. This requires the monetary authorities to intervene in the movement of exchanges in the exchange market by influencing the volume of supply or demand for foreign currency through the use of its foreign currency reserves, the US dollar, the euro, or others, to buy the local currency from the market at a specific price.
This leads to maintaining a constant demand for the local currency in order to prevent a decrease in the value of this local currency and, accordingly, to maintain the stability of its exchange rate. In this case, it is required that the government have sufficient reserves of currency or foreign currencies to enable it to make purchases. Hence, the ability of governments to support the demand for the local currency is linked to their possession of sufficient quantities of foreign currencies and the continued flow of these foreign currencies to their financial stock.
In December 2020, the Iraqi government resorted to devaluing the Iraqi dinar against the US dollar by 20%. To clarify the direct effects of that decision, it is sufficient to point out that the official exchange rate of the US dollar in the Iraqi market before this decision was 1189 Iraqi dinars, and after the new decision the value of the dinar declined and the exchange rate rose to 1458 against the dollar. This decision came after the Iraqi stockpile of foreign exchange decreased as a result of the significant drop in oil prices at the time.
Usually, the rationale for such monetary measures is that the downward slide of the local currency value curve raises the value of foreign cash reserves against the domestic currency. Thus, instead of the government printing more of its domestic currency notes, it can get more returns in local currency from its foreign exchange reserves.
At first glance, the result of this is a large growth overnight in the government’s stock of money, but this growth does not occur naturally, but is artificially created through monetary policies. For example, if we assume that the Iraqi government had $1,000 in its reserves prior to the devaluation of the dinar, that was equal to only 1,189,000 Iraqi dinars, while the value of this thousand dollars would rise after the devaluation of the Iraqi currency to 1,458,000 Iraqi dinars.
Accordingly, the Iraqi government’s coffers of domestic cash on paper will grow by 20%, while the volume of cash reserves in foreign currency remains constant without any change. This will create the false impression that the Iraqi government has become richer or has greater financial capacity than it was before the devaluation.
Undoubtedly, there are major positive macroeconomic effects of currency devaluation. A devaluation of the currency makes the country’s exports of that currency cheaper in international markets. Thus, this contributes, at least in theory, to an increase in the volume of exports of that country and thus to the strengthening of economic activity. In addition, the depreciation of the local currency against foreign currencies can make the devaluation country a more attractive and competitive tourist destination, which creates opportunities for foreign capital inflow. This could also attract foreign investors to invest their money in investment opportunities in this country that require them to bear lower costs to start projects compared to what they may incur to seize similar opportunities and projects in other countries.
However, although the devaluation of the currency may give the government the appearance of financial health and a prosperous economy, there are severe effects that will be reflected on the economy in general, unleashing a cascade of negative effects that will negatively affect all individuals and families that live in that state.
It is unlikely that the relative positive effects of currency devaluation will be realized in the case of Iraq, because its non-oil exports are very small, as it imports most of its food and commodities from abroad. As for oil, Iraq’s exports are constrained by adherence to the quota system set by OPEC, not to mention the existence of technical and structural constraints on its ability to produce and export. The destabilization of the security and political situation, or at least the perception abroad that Iraq suffers from insecurity and lacks political stability, continues to reduce the competitiveness of Iraqi tourism, especially non-religious tourism.
Perhaps the most significant and most severe effect of currency devaluation is that the decrease in the purchasing power of this currency reduces the demand for it. A holder of a banknote of 25,000 dinars, for example, will get a smaller amount in dollars, sterling, euros, or other, if he decides to spend it abroad, for example, if he decides to travel abroad for any purpose, whether tourism, recreation, or study. , or hospitalization, or something else. What is worse is that its owner will buy with it less goods or foodstuffs than he could have bought before the devaluation.
Thus, the local currency will no longer be desirable, which will lead investors or owners of capital to abandon it by exchanging what they have in the local currency and converting it into foreign currencies in order to reduce their losses and protect their capital. It will lead to a ‘herd mentality’ (herd mentality), which is based on the behavior of imitating others in what they do just because they do so, to the rush of capital owners to convert their money into foreign currencies, which may lead to additional declines in the value of the local currency, meaning that the effect of this will be similar to the fall of stones Dominoes arranged one after the other so that the fall of the first stone leads to the succession of falling of the following stones, and this is known in social and political sciences as the “domino effect”. In the end, the population will face economic inflation, which, if the state does not confront it by raising wage rates at rates equal to it, will eventually lead to negative life and economic manifestations such as low standards of life, weak ability to spend and purchase, and a contraction of economic activity.
Here we are asked a question: Should the Iraqi government re-value the Iraqi dinar? The position of the Iraqi Finance Minister on this issue is clear. He considers that there is no room for revaluation of the currency and that this is not possible and defies logic because of the repercussions and dire consequences that it will entail. But while revaluation may have negative effects, revaluation is actually possible and will lead to greater economic benefits. Below we will try to explore the advantages and disadvantages of revaluing the dinar at the present time.
Raising the value of the currency is in contradiction with the policy of devaluing it, because it will raise the value of the Iraqi dinar against foreign currencies, especially the US dollar. If the government takes a decision to raise the value of the dinar, we may return to an exchange rate equal to or close to the previous exchange rate, which is 1189 dinars to the dollar, based on the rate that the government will consider appropriate.
Taking such a decision will raise the purchasing power of individuals and families who have balances in Iraqi dinars, and the prices of imported materials in the local market will decrease, which will contribute to providing better quality and more diverse foreign products to the Iraqi consumer in the local market. With the decline in import prices and the rise in the value of the dinar, prices in the market will adjust in proportion to the new exchange rate, which will lead to a decline in inflation levels, without necessarily implying the return of the inflation level to what it was before the devaluation of the currency.
The increase in the purchasing power of the Iraqi consumer and the improvement in the quality and quality of goods available in the market will lead to greater demand for spending and make the economy in general in a more healthy position, which will make Iraq more attractive to foreign investors. Also, re-raising the value of the dinar will provide the Iraqi government with greater liquidity from foreign currencies, which will help it to pay off any sovereign debts owed by it to foreign countries, because the Iraqi dinar will buy a larger amount of foreign currencies, which will reduce the burden of debt repayment.
On the other hand, it is also important to take into consideration the downside of revaluation. The higher the value of the currency, the more expensive it becomes for foreigners, which will weaken the ability of foreign tourists or suppliers of goods and commodities to Iraq to buy Iraqi goods and services compared to what it was before the re-value of the dinar was revalued. This could lead to less foreign money flowing into the tourism and hospitality sectors, including hotels and restaurants, as well as prompting foreign countries to look for cheaper alternatives to Iraqi exports.
But if we take the reality of the Iraqi economy and the fact that the main commodity that Iraq exports is oil, then an analysis of the costs and benefits of re-raising the value of the dinar will lead us to an estimate of how this measure affects Iraq’s competitiveness in the global oil market. It is also important to take into consideration the developments of the war currently raging in Ukraine, and the resulting rise in oil prices. It is certain that the rise in oil prices alone will raise the level of the flow of US dollars into the Iraqi state treasury. But at the moment we do not have any information that would help us to arrive at an accurate estimate of the length of time that oil prices will remain high in the future. Perhaps the current rise in the price of oil in the world market will be short-lived and will recede as soon as a solution is reached between the two warring countries, or if OPEC decides to raise production quotas in order to reduce world oil prices.
The Iraqi government can consider keeping the situation as it is and not raising the value of the dinar. However, it seems that the economic benefits of revaluing the dinar far outweigh the policy of stalling at the current situation. Therefore, it deserves a closer objective look away from the tumultuous political wrangling. The timing of the dinar revaluation step is critical. The current time is very appropriate for that, especially in light of the significant rise in oil prices, the reluctance of OPEC to raise production quotas, and the continuation of the raging international conflict in and around Ukraine, which is putting pressure in the direction of high oil prices and high international demand for it.
Burathanews.com
Baghdad / Obelisk: The First Deputy Speaker of Parliament, Hakim Al-Zamili, revealed, three paragraphs during the next parliament session.
Baghdad – The President of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, Bafel Talabani, hinted , on Thursday, to the possibility of agreeing on one candidate for the presidency of the Republic, during his meeting with a delegation from the European Union.
The selection of Iraqi president have been delayed because of the sharp division between the two main Kurdish parties over which candidate should fill the role reserved for their group.
{Politics: Al Furat News} The Speaker of Parliament, Muhammad Al-Halbousi, announced, on Tuesday evening, the date of the session for the election of the President of the Republic.
The rise in prices in the markets and the price of the dollar against the dinar is still the most important concern for the citizen and public opinion alike, and despite the package of reforms launched by the government to find immediate solutions to the price rise crisis, but the issue of the value of the dollar against the dinar remains the biggest obstacle in the way of market stability, which increased The size of the challenge is the court’s entry into the line of the case, after postponing its session, which it held last Tuesday, to the fourth of the same next April, to consider the exchange rate of the dollar.
The Independent / Dollar sales operations through the window of the Central Bank are economically classified according to the Open Market Operations method, and they followed in Iraq a year later the political change for the purpose of controlling the exchange rate, which is an important part of monetary policy, as the exchange rate was considered a nominal fixer for the policy.
