08/11/2016 Jassim Hilfi / numerous political terminology is used when writing about the protest movement, which has been used in error or misplaced, such as cracking, deviation, Alliance, and so on . Unfortunately, that misunderstanding and ignorance are not alone pays to the confusion of concepts, but are deliberate attempts by corruption and sectarian symbols, through their flags and Twabahm Almstnfran to protect the quotas and corruption. So that the attempt to weaken the protest movement and distortion are among the influential strategies, quotas and corruption leaders.
Before turning to the term and the concept of the split, which was launched on every variation or difference in perceptions and working methods of the protest movement, which is locked in a struggle continued under a complex and tangled and sensitive circumstances .. before that we would like to show that this concept has been used often in political literature revolutionary, especially after the Stalinist era, when the communist and revolutionary parties. He became popular when the Palestinian resistance factions in the seventies, when the split tomorrow where news familiar, so that any organization which was not exposed to the defection of one, but defections succession has become a constant.
SPLIT mean a split in the framework of the organization, which usually happens when you get an intellectual differences between members of the party or one system, or when a leadership split in anticipation of the lead, which can not, including natural regulatory means. But unfortunately the use of this concept is misplaced, when talking about the protest movement. The movement of protest is not a revolutionary organization or a political party, nor is it a civil society organization. Protest movement within the concept of social movement, open-lateral organization of the participation of any citizen, and not a fixed membership. Vhgmeha momentum and go up and Ahbtan depending on numerous factors, unrelated to the factors that affect the expansion or contraction of party membership. Also, the activities of this movement can not be viewed as to the activity of civil society organizations, carry out a specific and particular projects. This is why both the party and the organization of civil society on one side, and the protest movement on the other hand, its own concept. Just as each with its own nature, and his regime and contexts and tasks. It is not true confused. We have noted recently, talking about trading, "a split of civil power" is widely used. As if the current civil party or a specific membership organization, has fixed rules and rigid ideology, and his uniform, and his policy. The owners forget this talk that the civil power, up to this moment, it is within the direction of public opinion, includes civil society organizations, activists and civilians, and secular parties, personages, social, political and cultural academy. General trend has been unable basic strength of this find a certain part of him. This is the challenge that faces his political future. It is until now not been framed in a particular organization, it has been true to say optimistic words, that the political context of which are in the process of crystallization, and regulatory trends in the making.
I've got and will contrast the difference in the framework of the protest movement, as well as in the broad framework of civil stream, on the demands and priorities and relationships, working methods and others. This is perfectly normal, and even healthy phenomenon, not Taft activity of the protest movement, nor weaken the civil power or reduce the dash and his quest to build democracy and social justice on the basis of the civil state. State rights, law and institutions, social, health, educational and guarantees. State that believes in the rights and safeguard the freedoms and sponsor guarantees and respects human dignity. The strength of civil power lies in its diversity, and the clarity of his vision, his determination and intensity.