«New Morning» Get the first session of the Council of the decisions of the judiciary
«New Morning» Get the first session of the Council of the decisions of the judiciary in 2016
January 12th, 2016
Courts face Report publishes newspapers in a wide spread
BAGHDAD - A new morning:
I got «New Morning» the recent decisions of the Supreme Judicial Council session, which was held under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all its members, the first in 2016. The outcome of the first meeting of a group important decisions concerning the judicial work, While the Council expressed the importance of the role of the public prosecutor at the current stage, he stressed to pursue recovery of terrorism suspects and financial corruption files, as federal judiciary announced uncles sent includes the deployment of judicial Altbaleg in the media and widespread, denying certain newspapers allocated to complete this procedure.
Other courses witnessed by the meeting Follow-up the cases of detainees in their positions, and the decline of work secret Palmbr.
Activating the role of the public prosecutor
The State of the Judiciary Council at its recent high priority to activate the role of the public prosecutor in «follow-up criminal cases in the investigation and trial League, especially in cases related to integrity and terrorism and coordination with the judges and the Integrity Commission and stakeholders to resolve these cases according to the law».
The Council recommended that members of the public prosecutor to «follow up detainees' cases in the appellate regions all and visit the attitudes and the headquarters of the investigators and seeking to complete their cases», while the Council «prosecutor in the appellate region called for a schedule visit attitudes, and be responsible for a number of detainees files until completion».
The Council requested the prosecutors in the appellate regions «provide a monthly report to the Supreme Judicial Council and the presidency of the Public Prosecution».
Follow-up Files Recovery
The session also stressed the «follow-up Files Recovery in coordination with the foreign and interior ministries to retrieve the convicts and fugitives outside Iraq, especially on issues of integrity and terrorism».
The meeting of judges and discussed the development of the judicial supervision of the court style, while they decided to «do the heads of the appeal personally tours oversight on all courts in the appellate region once a month at least all that is necessary», They pointed out that «in order to assess the progress of work and addressing its obstacles and to report Detailed to the Supreme Judicial Council in addition to what the judicial supervision by affiliates of body functions according to the law and to provide a monthly report to the Supreme Judicial Council ».
According to the paper, the decisions that came out of the meeting, the Council stressed the «follow-up application uncles issued by the Supreme Judicial Council and the judge should be the registration of all cases that come before the courts in the investigation (base record) before being presented to the competent judge».
According to the decisions that «shall not take any decision before registration for the purpose of tuning issues and control the proceedings and to prevent the disposal of violation of the law.»
Pending administrative investigation
The Council discussed in its «follow-up application uncles of him and the judge should be the competent authorities to conduct the administrative inquiry within a period of time suitable take into account the element of speed as attributed to one of its members from functional irregularities before being referred to the courts or the Integrity Commission in coordination with the Public Prosecution Service.»
According to the meeting, the assembled judges decided «should be boards of appeal provided for in the Judicial Organization Law No. meeting (160) for the year 1979 in the first Thursday of every month to review the process of the appellate region and the diagnosis of the negatives, if any, and develop solutions to address them and make recommendations on changing the judges sites in the appellate region and provide periodically report to the Supreme Judicial Council and thus cooperation with the media in the region to show the appellate facts ».
On the other hand, the Board recommended specialized issues of integrity b »Obligation to cooperate with the Legal Advocate at the head of the Public Prosecution which ratios of the Supreme Judicial Council on 01.03.2016 to follow up issues relating to integrity in order to be completed in cooperation with the concerned authorities» the courts.
Remember orphans Secretariat
As committed «first heads of Appeal judges in the courts to monitor the accounts, especially concerning trusts that goes back to the citizens, especially the orphans and minors and to accelerate delivered to their owners.»
According to the decisions, the Council also decided to «put the requirements of each transaction regard to its completion in the judiciary panel prominent place in court to enable the citizen to know what to submission of documents to be treated Acronym time and effort in order to achieve transparency.»
He called «boards of Appeal to re-distribution of staff in the courts according to the real need according to the approved administrative criteria, according to the capabilities of each of them taking into account their place of residence.»
And I would recommend »work to complete the project kindergartens in the appellate district centers and provide them with human and logistical inputs to provide psychological stability for staff and good upbringing of future generations».
As promised that «2016 will be the end of the process of manual adjustment in suits and happening to electronic tuning», promised that one of the responsibilities of the heads of Appeals.
And the face of the judiciary in this session also «the federal judiciary hardware components taking into account all the financial situation of the state in the light of falling oil prices and in the area of spending in all its forms and a commitment to strictly financial instructions».
On the other hand, the Council gave thanks and appreciation to the «employees of the Central Criminal Court judges and members of the Public Prosecution and investigators judicial and staff for their efforts during 2015 in the completion of terrorism-related cases an investigation and trial and rates record stood at (27 545) suit in the role of the investigation and (6362) suit in the role of trial », with the exception that« honest legal contribution in the fight against terrorism in any form and in accordance with the law. »
Also included thanks also «employees of specialized courts into the integrity of judges and members of the Public Prosecution and investigators judicial and staff for their outstanding efforts lawsuits during 2015 in the completion of cases referred to them, an investigation and trial, and rates a record of (3298) suit in the role of the investigation and (642) suit in the role of the trial before the court Criminal competent and (346) a case before the competent misdemeanor court », and pointed out that« these efforts constitute an effective contribution in addressing the crimes relating to integrity and unparalleled views all according to the law ».
Investigate telling secret
During the meeting, «emphasis on the criminal investigation and trial courts not to move the criminal case as soon as the (News series) or (e-mail) unless it is supported by evidence or the presumption of considering a law».
The participants confirmed judges to «proceed with the application of the rest of the terms of the plan (development of the judiciary), approved by the Supreme Judicial Council held on 08.17.2015», as directed «tribute and pride of the Iraqi army on the occasion of the anniversary of the Ninety-fifth its inception and for the Iraqi police on the occasion of the anniversary of its founding the ninety-fourth ».
In another context, the federal judiciary announced uncles sent includes the deployment of judicial Altbaleg in the media and widespread, denying certain newspapers allocated to complete this procedure.
The judge said Abdul Sattar Bayrakdar official spokesman said that «the Supreme Judicial Council uncles sent to all courts that includes the deployment of judicial Altbaleg print ads in newspapers and widespread».
Bayrakdar He added that «uncles newspaper was allocated without the other», pointing out that «that the validity of the competent judge, who determines the newspaper in which the Special Report to the case presented in front of him published».