Federal Court found constitutional mechanisms to question the prime minister and the ministers
Date: 07/12/2015 13:24

Information / BAGHDAD / ..
It issued the Federal Supreme Court, Monday, constitutional interpretation of the articles on the completion of the interrogation process in the House of Representatives.
The spokesman said the judiciary Judge Abdul Sattar Bayrakdar in a statement received by the agency / information / copy of it, "the Federal Supreme Court today considered the request from the General Secretariat of the House of Representatives for the interpretation of texts relating to the process of interrogation., Which came in article (61 / VII-c ), and Article (61 / VIII a) of the Constitution, "adding that it" has issued a decision to do so. "

He added that "under the resolution, the interrogation must be in agreement as provided for in Article (61 / VII c) of the Constitution," pointing out that "provides an application written to the President of the House of Representatives of a House of Representatives approval of the 25 members, and that the applicant or endorsed by he could withdraw his application to the lack of legal or constitutional objection to withdraw from this interrogation. "

Bayraktar explained that "the withdrawal of one demand of the number of providers (25) member leads to prejudice the quorum set by Article (61 / VII c) of the Constitution, then becomes the application does not fulfill the conditions mandated by the Constitution, in which case the interrogation canceled and that an his limbs deadline, and if the request meets the conditions of interrogation Phippeshr House of Representatives commissioned in accordance with the Constitution, "noting that" the process does not take place until after seven days at least, after submission of the application. "

And the spokesman of the judiciary that "after the end of questioning and scrutiny answers and compare them with the evidence provided by the House of Representatives builds his conviction viewpoint questioned him after discussion, as that decision convinced the Federal Court of whether or not to put to the vote if the Council voted by an absolute majority (a majority of the number of attendees) after check Quorum on conviction shall be subject answers the questioner finished. "

Bayrakdar and went on that "in the absence of conviction Council answers will move to other steps to withdraw confidence from the minister by an absolute majority", the minister is resigning from the date of the decision to withdraw confidence,

Abizaid "either in the case of withdrawal of confidence from the Prime Minister and the gravity of that in the political life of the country and the resulting withdrawal of confidence from all ministers and conversion of the Council of Ministers to the caretaker Council until the formation of a new cabinet has the constitution stipulated that a request to withdraw confidence in advance of the President of the Republic , as the Constitution passed the House of Representatives at the request of (1/5) one-fifth of its members also withdraw confidence. "

The resolution also stated that he "may not make such a request except after an interpellation directed to the prime minister and after at least seven days from the submission of the application."

According to Bayrakdar that "the Constitution stipulated to withdraw confidence from the Prime Minister of the vote from the board the absolute majority of its members," he continued, "In this case the ministry is dissolved," noting that "the continuation of the Prime Minister and ministers in their positions to run the daily affairs for a period not exceeding 30 days until a new cabinet in accordance with the steps set out in Article 76 of the Constitution. "

He stressed that the decision "will be questioning in all cases professionally and objectively away from political motives and personal reasons"

.anthy / 25 R.