September 2, 2015 in the media center, articles Add comment
The emergence of blatant and insulting to all the Arab forces (Shiite) in Iraq; Share Iran's Qods Force commander, Qassem Soleimani, the political body of the National Alliance meeting (Shiite), chaired by the foreign minister, Ibrahim al-Jaafari, with the participation of the Secretary-General of the Dawa Party, the head of the state law, Nuri Maliki, and the leader of the Supreme Council, Ammar al-Hakim, the leader of the Badr Organization, Hadi al-Amiri, a representative of the cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, and of course the prime minister, Haydar al-Abadi.
Soleimani effect on the leaders of these blocs and parties may be based, attended the meetings or did not attend. But, in light of the special circumstances in Iraq, and the political process it, and delinquency Prime Minister (Abadi) of curvature of the storm Iraqi demonstrations, a series of promises of reform, initiated by acting against the most important pillars of dominance excessive grip on governance and the files of corruption in Iraq Nouri al-Maliki and his decision to his dismissal from his vice president, and the launch of the hands of the Commission of Inquiry on the fall of Mosul with the organization of the Islamic State (Daash), to raise the reservation for said Maliki's name, as one of the main responsible for this dangerous event, and that Iraq is still suffering from its consequences, both in the provinces that have tumbled in after the interest of the organization, or that it represents a realistic threat to the future of the capital, Baghdad, and therefore, the entire rule-based system, then the Iraqi Council of Representatives to refer the case file to the Iraqi judiciary, without any immunity or privacy name contained therein. All of these things were meant for Iran, which he visited al-Maliki after his dismissal directly, that its project in Iraq is at stake, and that al-Abadi flops in governance and crisis response, without Tehran forget that the Iraqi prime minister is the son of partisan institution that made the care and feeding of Iranian hundred in percent (Dawa), and that the time has come to wakes, or permission to withdraw a little, to stop Aagalh (emotional) to satisfy the demonstrators at the expense of (Iraqi Shiite political model pro-Tehran).
From here, then, it was to attend Soleimani Iraqi National Alliance meeting, headed by al-Jaafari, and here, too, enter Abadi in a very critical angle, established by the face-to-face with the Secretary General of his party's direct and responsible, Nuri al-Maliki, also made it to the General Qassem Soleimani man who terrorizes Tehran by all leaders in the region, and considers general supervisor on the project and export its revolution to many parts outside Iran, including the Levant certainly, will attend Soleimani was fruitful? Did Maliki succeeded in recycling Abadi to return it to its normal size, before he personally nominated for prime minister, following the rejection of all give al-Maliki himself third term? And what role the rest of the powers that fall under the banner of this alliance?
The first Iranian Gen. messages that occur out in front of everyone is not Tehran satisfaction, specifically the Supreme Leader for Abadi own decisions to dismiss al-Maliki specifically, as well as the referral of the file that contains the name as one of the most important of those responsible for the fall of Mosul to the judiciary. And attributed to Soleimani as saying "Iran opposes al-Maliki trial, because it is more like a trial model in Shiite rule has failed, and that there are views, now, is fighting through slogans and goals that brought the demonstrators", and because most of the forces that were in this meeting is an Iranian-Hawa The decision, it was the meeting like the process of reprimand to the owners, and clear and the threat of Soleimani, and that his presence and his talk with everyone, and with the Iraqi Prime Minister in particular, had warned of the consequences of moving to this approach, and that he should be more assertive in the face of these events and the rest of the opponents, which Mark Abadi in big trouble, forced him to respond to its title Soleimani (prime minister of Iraq). Indicating the importance of the decisions taken and the personal and national desire to achieve the promise of the Iraqis.
And the non-reported news sources, the objection Abadi, and in spite of such of (boldness) For others, it was not the reason for leaving Qassem Soleimani meeting later; but the reason was clear to all, which he said means "come in order to turn off this farce in crisis management mode in Iraq, now, and that Iran can not afford to be patient more, until you see the exit of all Iraqis to reject the current government, and the influence of Tehran. We will not allow, after this day, demolition achievements have been made for 13 years, "said the seal, as well, including means of Ebadi and (elsewhere)" has Forewarned is forearmed. "
In front of the Iraqi prime minister, Haydar al-Abadi, after this confrontation, or the immediate threat of Gen. Qassem Soleimani, two options. First, be honest with the people of Iraq, who protesters and impervious out who rules Iraq, a Shiite or a Sunni, and then rely on him, relying exclusively on the capabilities of not contaminated by the corruption or the blood of both civilians and military personnel currently in service, or national depositors in Prisons since more than a decade, with the full removal of the religious establishment for the management of the crisis at the moment, as a prelude to building an Iraqi government of technocrats, established to rebuild the Iraqi civil state, and will be assisted by the worsening of the political conflict between the Shiite wings within the National Alliance, and lining up the Sadrists with reforms promised package , and complained implicitly dictates Soleimani, in favor of Nuri al-Maliki. It is this option supports that the supreme authority, Mr. Ali al-Sistani in Najaf, supports, currently, Abadi position, and qualify a clear degree of involvement of many officials (led by al-Maliki) in cases of corruption have led, directly, to the case of default reached Iraq levels all .
The second option for Ebadi is the bow of the Iranian threat to the strong, and the freezing of decisions specifically al-Maliki, and the launch of the hands of the forces of the militias and parties loyal to Iran in the National Alliance, and beyond, to act decisively, and outside the scope of the state, to end the subject of the demonstrations quickly, and what is not allowed Bancharha, and the participation of all categories Iraqi people age, class and nation in which, this behavior seemed to prepare him clear in the Secretary General of the Badr Organization and the commander of the most prominent statements in the popular crowd, Hadi al-Amiri, as well as threats and warning the Supreme Council leader Ammar al-Hakim, the demonstrators from the consequences of continuing in demonstrations or Aatsamathm. This option would lead specifically to the atrocities in Iraqi blood waste, as well as in transforming the Iraqi government (represented including the, Abadi or otherwise), if it succeeds in eliminating these events in this format, the enemy of all the Iraqi people, and will not be after the representative of one, and especially Iraq's Shiites as well as his year.
Clear the way very front of Haider al-Abadi, but lonely and difficult and dangerous, it wanted to be the leader of an Iraqi goes to his country and his people to the righteousness of deliverance and salvation of corruption and sectarian quotas and the Iranian occupation, he should "not Istohac right through to the lack of Saleckih", especially since the entire people asking this out the way, will find him in the face of militias dark, blood and dependency that holed up employers corruption and implementers of the Iranian project in Iraq, does Sevolha Abadi, to avoid the face of embarrassing seconds, management Qassem Soleimani, or will choose to put Soleimani in the face of the whole people of Iraq, shall be those will, and those leadership, a way to respond and fortified the desired change in Iraq.