Iraq »preparing to take a unified position on the reform paper on the eve of the dialogues which
[9:10] 12/Jul/16

Erbil, July 16 (PNA) - affirmed the decision of the Iraqi parliament and leader of the Iraqi List, Muhammad Al-Khalidi that «positions both within the Iraqi List, or the other blocks are still conflicting about the process of withdrawal of confidence or questioning of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, or about the Reform Committee set up by the National Alliance» .

He said Khalidi, who belongs to a block «Iraqi», led by Speaker of Parliament, Osama Najafi, within the Iraqi List, said in a statement to the newspaper «Middle East» that «the (Iraqi) such other political blocs have a clear position from the political process, and based on the importance of fundamental reform , but not through the formation of the committees or rotate the crises and problems, or rolled over, but to start proceedings and serious process », pointing out that« the positions that seemed to others like a contradiction within the (Iraqi), which was considered like a split within them, but rather expresses the essence of one, but methods and variations », adding that« all the political blocs now adopt the proposals of different degrees of this issue or that ».

Khalidi explained: «For this reason, in order to exit a uniform position on important issues currently on the table, such as the issue of withdrawal of confidence or questioning or discussion paper of reform, the (Iraqi) decided to meet and define its position clearly from these issues».

In response to a question on any positions can be adopted; Is reform paper or interrogation? Said Khalidi: «In all cases the dialogue is required, and we Sntaty with reform paper in a positive, without being at the expense of our positions other, including the questioning, because this case does not belong to us, but we have partners, and I can say that the alliance Arbil - Najaf is still provides no confidence and interrogations, regardless of the position of the reform paper, which sometimes seems like a kind of barter, which is not true ».