What is the seventh item and why Kuwait insists on keeping Iraq in which
(And independent Iraqi news agency / report) to be the start to recall that the Charter of the United Nations on the basis of the freedom of all peoples of the earth ... And that the state does not violate the limits of another State or attacking them only if they self-defense.
The Charter consists of 111 material is organized in 19 chapters and is a three chapters 5, 6, 7 is the most important chapters, and most particularly is the seventh item ... In this last item speaks of the Security Council and its terms of reference, and includes 3951 articles of the Charter, this item a seventh titled «Action with respect to threats to peace, breaches of the aggression took place» note that the importance of these materials stems from it includes a recipe forced to apply to their countries Salutation
Often we have heard recently about the Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations, has been much talk about, especially with regard to the decision of the Security Council in the recent war on Gaza (Resolution 1860) which calls for the warring parties to cease fire and withdrawal of the invading forces and the return to a previous outdated. The decisions made under Chapter VII resolutions shall be binding on the parties to implement, but despite the mandatory resolution 1860 as the seventh item, but Israel threw him on the wall and that was a flagrant violation of international law
If applied the seventh item entirety, we find that Israel is now carefully from the procedures that will use its right as a result of breaching the decision binding, from cutting political relations among States and cut economic links and telephone lines, telegraph and postal ending military intervention by air or sea to restore peace and security violators, if they did not use the United States right to use the so-called veto, which is always dreaded is used for the service and its allies.
Characteristics of the seventh item:
Should refer to the important stuff is in the seventh item is 39.41, 42, and content are:
Article 39: is the stage of the decision of the UN Security Council, they decide there has been a threat to the peace, breach of, or what happened was an act of aggression.
Article 41: In this Article the Security Council take the necessary measures, which do not require the use of armed force to implement its decisions only issue sanctions if the economic stop the prayer and of rail, sea, air, postal, etc., and complete or partial.
Article 42: In the event that Article 41 would be deter from breach of peace or attempted aggression against another country, in this article may of the Security Council to take action by air, sea and land as may be necessary for the maintenance of peace and international security, and may include such actions siege and air and maritime operations.
1 does not apply this article to the permanent membership or its ally, even if used right, it is a permanent member veto «veto» to prevent the issuance of a Security Council resolution based on Chapter VII.
2 in the case of the issuance of any decision of the Security Council must take possession of the votes of nine members of the council, at least. Including the votes of the five permanent members, and we must vote these five positively, in the case of abstaining from voting, or absence, is not considered a negative vote.
3 could be a security sensor to recommend non-binding recommendation in the case of a state of peace is threatened. The recommendation is not resolution because the resolution is binding on the State Salutation.
4 If the decision then will be binding on the State Salutation.
5 The weak state is the seventh item on this agenda item was to protect them from the occupation of the Great State, while the reality is the opposite, where the state is a major beneficiary of this item as they harness the Security Council and the seventh item to serve the interests and objectives.
Proof of this is that the UN Security Council Resolution 242, which is under the sixth item, which provides for Israeli withdrawal from territories occupied in the 22 / November / 1967 is a non-binding, although the United States from the state that voted in favor of this recommendation.
Because this decision is under item VI and not VII, it is a recommendation, not a binding decision, and that America is well aware that the decision which is under Chapter VII is binding on the State Salutation, and the other is just a recommendation only, so voted by the United States.
America does not respect international law, if the Security Council voted against the condemnation of Israel Bajmall accelerated vertically to the use of the veto «veto».
The often used by the U.S. Chapter VII, it is used in the Balkans, Africa, Asia, and especially oil country.
As America geared to serve global Zionism, then Clause VII geared to serve the goals of Zionism very much.
So we take the decisions of the Security Council resolutions against Iraq after Afghanistan and Iran to the day, although it did not take any binding resolution against Israel, despite their violation of international peace and security, and aggression against the Islamic state and in particular Palestine and Lebanon.
The seriousness of the seventh item
Since 1990 and particularly after the invasion of Kuwait by Iraqi many use the seventh item in the decisions on Iraq was promulgated more than 60 resolutions, and continued decisions until after the restoration of Kuwait and all decisions were within the seventh item that is, they bound the exception of a single resolution of 688, which guarantees to secure the rights political and human rights for all citizens and to stop the genocide and repression that was practiced by the former regime against the Iraqi people. ... This is only a non-binding resolution 688 ... And decisions by the humiliation of the whole of Iraq is binding decisions.
The most serious binding decisions issued against Iraq is the resolution 678 dated 3 / April / 1991 The Abu decisions are, and contains a decision on the 34 articles all of which put Iraq at risk of the seventh item Almschr to serve U.S. goals of Zionism, was Iraq under American tutelage under umbrella of the United Nations.
So while U.S. forces announced the entry into Iraq in April / 2003 that it had gas in accordance with UN resolution 1483 and later amended this resolution, the same forces fired on a multi-national decision
"Truth is everlasting, but our ideas about truth are changeable. Only a little of the first fruits of wisdom, only a few fragments of the boundless heights and depths of truth, have I been able to gather"