Judge assigned to consider cases of corruption in the interior: a special detachment to hunt the corrupt
A judge appointed by the Supreme Judicial Council appointed a special judge before the Office of the Inspector General of the Ministry of Interior to look into cases of corruption in the departments of the Ministry of the control of cases of bribery by officers and associates referred to the Internal Security Forces courts, confirming that a special security detachment to hunt down the corrupt.

"When we receive information or information that there is a case of corruption or financial extortion against officers or employees of the Ministry of the Interior, a detachment is formed by the Office of the Inspector-General by decision," Judge Nada Mohammed Issa told the judge. Judicial order to bring the accused to trial. "

Issa added that "after the presence of the source of information or the laboratory is recorded as either a detective or complainant and deal with the news in a confidential way to protect the security of the citizen," pointing out that "a judicial order issued a formation of a detachment of security elements in civilian clothes equipped with equipment and equipment to document cases of blackmail And to arrest the accused of the criminal offense. "

"The location of the ambush is determined according to the situation, and arrested a number of officers and associates accused of bribery cases of the famous crime," calling for citizens who are subjected to extortion and asked to pay bribes to "resort to justice"

She noted that "the possibility of recording news about the situation in the court, which is the crime in the work of its responsibility and is treated in complete confidentiality," expressing "regret about the weakness of culture and legal awareness of some citizens who provide information to the court but do not know the full name of the offender or the officer and his position "He said.

"There are citizens who are lenient with this act and ignore the provision of the news on the grounds that the court procedures are slow while the court takes action on the day Vnsah after the written statements."

Issa pointed out that "the court looks at all issues related to all joints of the Ministry of the Interior and that our complainants may be officers or associates," asserting that "in this case are written statements and transmitted to the courts of the internal security forces by jurisdiction if there is no civilian party."

She explained that "the number of cases that are considered daily from 9 - 10," stressing that "the cases of extortion must be documented to the citizen."

"What a citizen needs to issue an arrest warrant is the simplest evidence the court can rely on by recording telephone calls, witness testimony, or any means that can document the crime," she said.

On the cases presented to the judiciary revealed that "a senior officer investigating the murder of a citizen asked for $ 100 thousand in exchange for issuing arrest warrants against people believed to be behind the killing of his brother."

Issa pointed out that "the arrival of the officer was through the complainant himself, where he told him about him was recorded and formed a detachment and arrested," indicating that "the citizen claimed the cooperation of the Director of the Criminal Office with this officer and asked the court to bring witnesses and issued an arrest warrant against the Director of the Office Combating criminality after the recording of witness statements ".

"Some citizens pay bribes and then inform or inform the court," he said. "In this case, the bribery motive is held accountable under a legal provision as a partner in the crime and referred to the competent courts."

She stressed that "the news about these cases and that the citizen does not pay bribes, but monitoring the name, position and location of the student bribery and documentation of crime."

"The goal of appointing a judge and deputy prosecutor to look into the cases of the Interior Ministry's inspector general's office is to reduce the phenomenon of administrative corruption and bribery in particular," said Judge Mohammed Abdel-Jazzah, deputy prosecutor at the second Rusafa investigation court.

"The bribery takes several pictures. Article 307 of the Iraqi Penal Code has identified three images: acceptance, demand and taking, and the prevailing picture is demand," he said.

"The prosecution has a big role, starting with recording the statements of the informant to verify whether he or she is hostile to the accused or not," he said.

He added that "all decisions issued by the investigating judge were brought to the public prosecutor and sometimes may be added to them," noting that "in the case of the arrest of the accused of the criminal offense, we stressed the seizure of the mobile device returned to the accused immediately to verify whether there are individuals involved with him."

He pointed out that "the amounts used in ambushes are of a sequence known to the judge and the detachment so that the defendant does not protest during the arrest that they belong to him."

LINK