Experts call the House of Representatives to stop interfering in the affairs of the courts 14.01.2017 at 12:43 (Baghdad time)
Baghdad balances News
Revealed bloc's policy intention to challenge the validity of the Supreme Judicial Council law after its publication in the Official Gazette, saying it violates the Constitution.
The experts and specialists House of Representatives warned of continuing to interfere in the affairs of justice, while noting that the Federal Supreme Court to prevent the adoption of legislation pertaining to the Federal Alqdhaih power without reference to it.
The MP said the coalition of state law Jabbar al-Abadi, said that "deputies from Ktltna process of challenging the Supreme Judicial Council law after ratification and publication in the Official Gazette."
Abadi said that "the law guarantees a clear violation of the constitution," pointing out that "the parliamentary legal committee conducted a comprehensive change to the draft submitted by the Federal judiciary within its code."
He pointed out that "the new law came circles did not touch the original project despite the fact that the Supreme Judicial Council evaluates more than its structure and needs of the districts."
Abadi pointed out that "the new legislation is the beginning of the dominance of the political blocs on the judiciary," and urged "the House of Representatives to exercise its role and stay away from interfering in the courts and the appointment of officials for the presidencies of Appeal tasks."
For his part, the legal expert Adil al-Lami, said that "the new law is a clear violation of the constitution and the transfer of a germ of sectarianism and party quotas to justice."
Lami said that "the exception Alorad expand in the Constitution to vote on the President of the Court of Cassation and the President of Judicial Oversight Commission and the chief prosecutor, and bring it under the new law also includes the heads of the appellate courts constitute an interference in the affairs of justice."
He noted that "the text of the Constitution on the independence of judges and their authority over that of the law, with the inadmissibility of interference in the judiciary Shaun of any authority."
On a related matter, the legal expert said the other lion Saadi, that "most of the paragraphs of the law was edited it without reference to the judiciary Entrepreneur and fully aware of the work in the courts and justice affairs and what you need from the legislation."
Saadi added that "the law was contrary to the decisions of the Federal Supreme Court, which decided in 2014 not to launch the hands of the House of Representatives in approving the judiciary legislation without taking their consent."
He stressed that "the Federal Supreme Court's decisions are binding on all authorities and follow them and not be ignored and therefore the Supreme Judicial Council, the law will be repealed for violating the constitutional judiciary orientations once challenged."
As called for al-Saadi to "preserve the prestige of the Iraqi judiciary and not to undermine it", he finds that "it is not reasonable to proceed with the laws of the House of Representatives is trying to undermine the authority of the courts sometimes strengthens the clans, and at other times working to break up the judiciary and interfering in the selection of judges."
The House of Representatives had voted at a meeting last Thursday , the Supreme Judicial Council , which included a number of items Act sparked ire among the judicial and legal. It ended https://www.mawazin.net/%D8%AE%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%A7-%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%B9%D9%88%D9%86-%D9%85%D8%AC%D9%84%D8%B3-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%86%D9%88%D8%