Legal expert: Parliament's refusal to amend the general amnesty by the reading of the two constitutionally invalid
12/4/2016
9:08
[Oan- Baghdad]
legal expert said Tariq Harb, the parliament rejected a draft law amending the general amnesty by the reading of the two constitutionally invalid
He said the war in a statement received by all of Iraq [where] a copy of it, that " the number of deputies and the deputies of the Legal Committee of the Parliament said their achievements in the previous legislation, but others believe that there are no achievements by the Legal Committee of the Parliamentary but may enter in the door of the failures have members of the legal Committee said they have taken the amnesty law without . Keep in mind that hundreds and thousands of people committed a terrorist crime or who committed the crime of kidnapping or the crime of bribery or crime of financial and administrative corruption or crime damaging effects have been released based on the amnesty law , which boasted by the members of the legal Committee "
He added that, "It is possible to make sure these numbers by asking the judiciary to provide them with a copy of those buyout amnesty with male material legal defendant or convict who was bringing them amnesty as well as possible to build on it from one account to prepare those who have been pardoned and buyout amnesty in spite of committing crimes mentioned and other crimes as a crime of theft threatened with weapons or committed aggravated. "
He said the war " I do not know Does that justify the Legal Committee of the Parliamentary that it terms of reconciliation or settlement or other words enough to be a compromise and reconciliation reason for the release of the terrorist and the hijacker and the briber and the bribed and the thief and the money involved is damaged relics and committed the crime of financial and administrative corruption that from the face and the face else".
He pointed out that " the government 's attempt to rectify the damage that resulted from the Amnesty Law to prepare a draft law amending and especially for crimes Daesh, kidnappings and the Legal Committee of a large campaign against the draft amendment law and then vote on the rejection of the law by reading it twice and hear the proposals of the House of Representatives and then voting on it is unconstitutional because it restricts the cabinet the authority in the preparation of draft laws in accordance with Article 60 of the Constitution , meaning it can parliament rejected a draft law prepared by the government after reading twice and vote on it, but not to the parliament rejected the government project in principle before the readings and vote. "
He pointed out the war to be "Article 132 of the Rules of Procedure which gave the House of Representatives this authority are contrary to the provisions of the Constitution on the government the power to have been received in Dakhli system and the foundation is the Constitution , not to mention that the provisions of this Article , which decides the rejection must go off to law proposals submitted by the House of Representatives , which does not go off to draft laws identified by the government as well as we have noticed that it is not bound by the provisions of Article 132 mentioned because that article stipulated that a majority of members , ie , the approval of 165 deputies , at least in the rejection which did not materialize session last Thursday and not , as the legal Committee of the parliamentary reported in the press conference. " https://www.alliraqnews.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=53957