Legal expert: general amnesty has excluded all former regime figures included corruption and terrorism offenses
[Oan- Baghdad]
said legal expert Tareq Harb, the general amnesty passed by the House of Representatives on Thursday the law "starts amnesty for financial and administrative corruption crimes and ends with an amnesty for terrorist crimes."
He said the war in a statement received by all of Iraq [where] a copy of it, that " the amnesty law for crimes of all first financial and administrative corruption crimes and the most recent terrorist crimes that are included in the re - trial."
He added , "did not exclude the amnesty law of inclusiveness pardon or pay cash allowance or retrial contained in this law , but only one case were at least two dozen number who were sentenced as men of the former regime of the ICC Olayan the rest of the crimes they are all covered by the amnesty does not even charges against the two deputies by the Minister of defense article also covered pardon . "
He continued the war, and" did not exclude from the amnesty for financial and administrative corruption crimes , the crime of embezzlement , and this is also coverage after paying the amount of money involved and excluded forgery crimes to get the positions of special grades of director general or above , and these other included a retrial note that the amnesty law covers murder and all crimes related to personal rights when the waiver. "
said legal expert" compendium of this law that the former regime , men who are not more than twenty they only prevent the law from the buyout amnesty or pay a sum of money for a period of imprisonment or a retrial or refund and the amnesty law which was released yesterday, and many details we will arrange allocation of words last reported. "
the House of Representatives, has approved in its meeting, on Thursday, a draft amnesty law after a dispute for years, especially the paragraph relating to the accused terrorist, where the law pointed to the formation of a judicial committee to be responsible for considering the extent of the possibility of re - trial of the accused to Article 4 / terrorism or not, not at the request of the accused himself.