28/6/2016
Long-Presse / Baghdad
The Federal Supreme Court decided on Tuesday Irrelevance Bgelsta the House of Representatives on 14 and 26 April, while the reasons attributed to the sessions violation of articles 14 and 38 of the Iraqi Constitution.
A reporter (range Press) that, the Federal Supreme Court decided today, Irrelevance Bgelsta the House of Representatives on 14 and 26 April, noting that, the court decided to cancel the decisions of both sessions.
He added that, the court attributed the reasons to the first session in which there is no quorum, explaining that, for the second session prevented from attending members of the House were closed doors Bugehm This is contrary to articles 14 and 38 of the Iraqi Constitution.
It is said that the Federal Supreme Court resumed on Tuesday to consider its claims challenged in the two sessions of the House of Representatives, which were held during the month of April.
The Federal Supreme Court on Monday decided (13 June 2016), to postpone consideration of claims challenged in the sessions, which Parliament held during the month of April, until the 28th of June current, while the new five experts called Bamhalam until the 26th of this month to submit their report, approved Federal Court on visiting experts to the House of Representatives for the detection sites without interference from the parties to the lawsuit.
And it resumed the Federal Supreme Court, Monday (13 June 2016), to consider its claims challenged in the two sessions of the House of Representatives, which were held during the month of April, as echoed by five legal experts right in front of the court.
Referred to the Federal Supreme Court Wednesday decided (8 June 2016), to postpone consideration of claims challenged Bgelsta the House of Representatives, which were held during the month of April, to next Monday (13 June 2016), which called for the parties to the suit by choosing new experts.
And it resumed the Federal Supreme Court on Wednesday (8 June 2016), its to consider claims challenged in the two sessions of the House of Representatives, which were held during the month of April, while I listened to the Committee of Experts' report, decided to postpone consideration on the grounds of some ministers dismissed the challenge to the constitutionality of a pink slip session until resolved parliament challenged Bgelsta suits.
The Federal Supreme Court on Monday decided, (6 June 2016), to postpone consideration of the appeal submitted claims Bgelsta the House of Representatives, which were held during the month of April to Wednesday (8 June 2016), while confirming that the parties to the suits supplied with ten tablets CDs (VCD) on the sessions.
The Federal Supreme Court has resumed, in the (29 May 2016), its to consider claims challenged in the two sessions of the House of Representatives, which were held during the month of April, while the meeting witnessed the performance of media experts and legal right to offer their expertise on two sessions of the House of Representatives, handed over the presidency of the court files Paljlstin, and he is given them six days to present their views.
The Federal Court on Wednesday, decided (25 May 2016), to postpone consideration of a lawsuit the two sessions of Parliament on Sunday (29 May 2016), after a hearing during the first session to the prosecutors of the House of Representatives of the protesters and the Presidency of the Parliament and to assign experts from the Faculty media to provide their views on the sessions.
The federal judiciary in the announced (18 May 2016) for determining, on the 25th of May 2016, as the date for the first hearing on claims of appeal submitted Bgelsta the House of Representatives, which were held during the month of April, as called after President Fuad Masum in the ( 21 May 2016), the Federal Court to "accelerate the exceptional" to resolve the problem of the House of Representatives.
It is noteworthy that the Federal Supreme Court called for in the (17 May 2016), the parties inviting me to appeal Bgelsta parliament sessions held during the month of April, to submit their answers within 15 days, and as pointed out it seeks to resolve the two cases in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution and the laws and regulations in force, confirmed that the hearings regarding the invitations which Tlguethma in the (12 May 2016), will be made public.

LINK:
http://www.almadapress.com/ar/news/72529