COI, shows details of judiciary opinion of money inflation and illicit earning file
3/13/2016
0 Comments

Picture
Coi clarified the details of judiciary opinion concerning files of money inflation of official persons and illicit earning, explaining these files are different from the rest of the other files of corruption if viewed from the competent judiciary of integrity cases.

COI indicated that the files of money inflation and illicit earning referred by it to the courts, if there is unjustified inflation in money of the covered persons to disclose their financial disclosure ``increase does not commensurate with their regular incomes " as stipulated in the article (18) from the applicable law of the commission.

The commission clarified that the law has granted the covered person in this file specifically deadline 90 days to prove legality of his money sources, pointing out that the judiciary a waits during 90 days and it does not rule, even if the period is over and the covered did not prove the legality of his money, so the justice will issue the decision against the covered under the article (19 and 20) applicable law of the commission no.30 in 2011 and the other applicable laws or acquit him.

The public opinion draws it attention to the attempts by some to exploit this information, which may be unknown to the people; to try to eliminate that the justice did not issue arrest orders or summon against them or what some have claimed the lack of lawsuits against them.

The commission clarified that when it referred files of money inflation and illicit earning to the justice, its task would be over by law, to remain those files at the justice, which waiting for referred to it during 90 days to issue after that the decisions that it deems suitable against them under the article (19 and 20) applicable law of the commission no.(30) in 2011 and other applicable laws.

Noteworthy to mention that article (19) of COI applicable law indicates to "the commission submit order for the covered who has proven the illicit earning to the investigation judge who evaluates the covered person within his locative competence to investigate to prove the legitimate sources increase that founded in his money, his wife`s money or one of his son`s money belonging to him within period of not less than 90 days ". while the article (20) stipulated on " each of those who did or was unable after being informed by the judge, to prove the legitimate sources increase that founded in his money, his wife`s money or one of his son`s money belonging to him, including not to commensurate with their resources, will be punished by imprisonment and a fin equal the value of illicit earning or one of these penalties and confiscate the illicit earning, taking into account the penalties stipulated in the applicable laws.

http://www.nazaha.iq/en_body.asp?field=news_en&id=1316&page_namper=e3